- From: Arthur Clifford <art@artspad.net>
- Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 23:41:23 -0700
- To: <public-html-comments@w3.org>
I would agree with Gareth's assessment. 'paranoid' seems an inappropriate word for a spec. It implies whoever wrote the spec doesn't think much about the feature or a user who would use it; while that may be a legitimate opinion, if the feature is to be present it should be described sans attitude. The polite phrase would be "... a concerned user ...". Art C Arthur Clifford -----Original Message----- From: public-html-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Gareth Rees Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 3:53 AM To: public-html-comments@w3.org Subject: The paranoid user Section 6.12.2.1 "Hyperlink auditing" says: > However, the ping attribute ... allows the paranoid user to disable > the notifications without losing the underlying link functionality. > The use of the word "paranoid" suggests that such a user's concerns about sending ping notifications are delusional: that is, in practice there is no gain in privacy from disabling the notifications. Is this what you mean to imply? If it is, I think it would be better if the text were more explicit. -- Gareth Rees
Received on Friday, 4 September 2009 06:41:59 UTC