W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-comments@w3.org > May 2009

Continuing

From: Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 14:28:24 -0500
Message-ID: <4A072AD8.9020808@burningbird.net>
To: whatwg@whatwg.org, public-html-comments@w3.org
Sorry for the double emails today.

I will continue with revisiting the use cases for the microdata section. 
One additional component I'll add to the use cases is applying my 
interpretation of how RDFa might handle the use case, as compared  to 
how it could be handled with Ian's new HTML5 microdata proposal. This 
will, of course, slow me down a bit.

Note, though, that I don't claim to be an expert on either RDFa or Ian's 
new microdata proposal.  My hope is that if I make a mistake, or I'm not 
clear, folks will respond to my writing with corrections and/or 
additions. The purpose behind my effort is to open discussion. I will 
admit, though, that I do have a bias for RDFa, primarily because this is 
something that's real, today, and that I can use, today.

Shelley
Received on Sunday, 10 May 2009 19:29:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 1 June 2011 00:13:59 GMT