- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 09 May 2009 11:14:52 +0200
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: "Chabot, Elliot" <Elliot.Chabot@mail.house.gov>, public-html-comments@w3.org
Ian Hickson wrote: > ... >> * Appendix C >> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/NOTE-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20-20081211/appendixC.html> >> of the W3C's Understanding WCAG 2.0 document identifies Dublin Core as >> one of three "[w]ell-known specifications (schemas) for metadata". > > I don't think anyone is suggesting that the folks at Dublin Core did > anything wrong, merely that in practice scheme="" has turned out to not be > necessary to mark up metadata that people actually subsequently use in any > significant sense. What would be useful is pointers to examples of people > actually using this data for a useful purpose, to solve real problems. > ... Again, the code I wrote for SAP many years ago relies on @scheme for resolving prefixes to (SAP KM) Property Names (which are XML expanded names). BR, Julian
Received on Saturday, 9 May 2009 09:15:42 UTC