- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 21:14:54 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27599 --- Comment #4 from Matt Wolenetz <wolenetz@google.com> --- (In reply to Aaron Colwell from comment #3) > I agree that requiring the [] is ugly. What if I made the constructor > parameter optional and provided a default of []? That at least makes it a > little less ugly. This seems a good approach to me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 16 December 2014 21:14:55 UTC