[Bug 25501] 3.2.4.1 missing discussion of 'empty' content model

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25501

--- Comment #3 from Karl Groves <kgroves@paciellogroup.com> ---
That's fine. My point is that the same explanation you just gave should be
provided in 3.2.4.1 so that a reader doesn't go there looking for an
explanation of what the 'Empty' Content Model is and find it missing.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2014 14:20:21 UTC