W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > October 2013

[Bug 23589] Endangered Features : output

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:04:10 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-23589-2486-Qvz9EQfKns@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

--- Comment #4 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Anthony from comment #2)
> Well, since that is my goal with each of these bugs, definitely. It means we
> can remove output from list. I can only hope that getting the other 4-6
> features I'm not wanting to see go off the list could be so easy.
> I filed a bug because I've checked the draft every few days for over a month
> and it hasn't changed. My concern is that if someone doesn't advocate for
> these features, the assumption will be that they won't be missed, without a
> real check on where the feature is in terms of implementation (obviously if
> one of the features became the talk of the town, it would survive, but
> significant implementation but still low like a jump from 3 - 10%
> implementation may not be taken seriously without a bug or a voice acting as
> a counter to being on the list in the first place).

Hi Anthony I would also note that because a feature is listed (currently) at
risk for HTML5 it does not mean that it is/will be removed from the 5.1 spec
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/ and if the feature is
interoperably  implemented then it will be removed from the list before HTML5
goes to Rec.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 22 October 2013 13:04:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:31:45 UTC