W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > October 2013

[Bug 20967] EME does not allow independent implementation, excluding open source implementations.

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 16:25:27 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-20967-2486-5C3rKevRwq@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

--- Comment #22 from Andreas Kuckartz <a.kuckartz@ping.de> ---
(In reply to Sam Ruby from comment #21)
> Based on this comment, it is clear that your definition of "Open" differs
> from the W3C management's definition of this term.

So far I have not seen this "W3C management's definition" in writing. There are
still people who erroneously think that the term "open" used by the W3C implies
that W3C "open" standards can be implemented as Open Source. It would help to
have such a definition in a form which avoids such misunderstandings.

I was not aware that Tim Berners-Lee had *already decided* that his final
acceptance of EME will *not* depend on whether it can be implemented as Open
Source. Thanks for that important clarification. I trust that you do not
misrepresent his position.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 4 October 2013 16:25:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:31:44 UTC