W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > October 2013

[Bug 23421] HTML-AAPI doc should be a living document

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 10:56:02 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-23421-2486-PMcn5PEbuw@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

--- Comment #1 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to James Craig from comment #0)
> All of the Accessibility APIs have changed somewhat since the first draft of
> the ARIA implementation guide. I worry that using the spec-track approach
> for external API mappings while only ensure that the document is immediately
> out of date at the time it is published. I'd recommend making this a living
> document rather than a spec-track document.

Hi james, this is not something that the editors can decide, it needs to be
brought up with the PF/HTML wg's.
Am unclear as to how a living document concpet fits in with the current
document track options available in the W3C, any ideas?

Also sounds like the ARIA implementation guide should changed to use a similar
approach right?

FWIW as i mentioned to you in another place, the always latest and publicly
available editors draft [1] is a 'living document' and I would expect
implementers to be using it over the periodic WD snapshots

[1] http://rawgithub.com/w3c/html-api-map/master/index.html

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2013 10:56:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:31:44 UTC