- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:47:17 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8895
Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|LATER |---
--- Comment #7 from Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> ---
Reopening as we have our first FPWD draft request that is generating
objections:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2013Jan/thread.html#msg102
Given that we have established that a preference poll can be used to terminate
work on a draft and publishing the result as a Note, perhaps we should consider
employing a similar process for establishing support for a FPWD over which
there isn't absolute consensus?
http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy-v3.html#note-vs-rec
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/microdata-status-preference-poll/results
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2013 20:47:25 UTC