[Bug 23661] 1 video stream requirement would restrict sign-language use cases.

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23661

--- Comment #6 from Adrian Bateman [MSFT] <adrianba@microsoft.com> ---
I remain unconvinced that technical evidence has been provided to support the
statement that "a minimally conformant MSE configuration will not satisfy
certain accessibility use cases, such as the use of a second synchronised video
to provide signed captioning of the first." Since synchronising video is out of
scope for MSE and would be provided by higher level functionality in HTML5 it
is not obvious to me what an implementation of MSE would have to do differently
to support this use case.

If the Accessibility Task Force chooses to re-open this bug I would strongly
urge them to explain the technical difference between and "minimally conformant
MSE" implementation and an implementation of MSE that does satisfy the "certain
accessibility use cases" they have in mind. In other words, what about the
network layer abstraction provided by MSE has to change?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Thursday, 19 December 2013 16:28:53 UTC