[Bug 21328] "coded frame" in the context of baseband essence.

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21328

--- Comment #6 from Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > I'm reopening this bug, which is related to the just filed
> > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21819. I don't have a strong
> > opinion about whether the term "encoded" or "editable unit" is used, but
> > "compressed" is the wrong term.
> 
> I agree that 'compressed' is the wrong term, but I still maintain my
> position that "editable unit" and "essence frame" is not a better option
> then the current term. If "coded frame" is still objectionable, I could
> change this to "media frame", but I still think in most cases that the
> "frames" will be coded in some form and require "decoding" in some sense of
> the word.

I'm fine with the term "Coded Frame". Let's just drop "compressed" from the
definition, which I think will satisfy myself and Pierre.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2013 21:56:59 UTC