- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 12:42:26 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21501
Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #8 from Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru> ---
Using longdesc to affect search engines isn't new :)
Things that are not forbidden by the spec are allowed (and in practice things
that are required by the spec may not happen, while things required not to
happy may happen anyway).
In general I am not disagreeing with the suggestions, just resisting adding
them all to the spec since I don't think they are critical.
And I am not going to enter into the discussion about what validation *should*
be available for free. As representative of a company that provides these
services, in some cases for free, I note that there is a concrete cost in
performing them. 'nuff said.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2013 12:42:28 UTC