W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > November 2012

[Bug 19582] Add coap and coaps to the whitelist'ed scheme list

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 07:27:22 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-19582-2486-uzG22Qllz8@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

--- Comment #17 from Thomas Fossati <tho@koanlogic.com> ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> So how is the user going to get this proxy? How is the user going to get the
> proxy set up as a handler for the coap: protocol?

As already said, the model here is: a web application proposes its HTTP-CoAP
proxy to the user.  If the user opts-in, the "coap" URIs that the web
application needs to link, will be requested via the configured HTTP-CoAP

> How will sites be
> restricted from communicating with this coap: protocol handler without the
> user's permission?

The access control function is not on the user.  It is on the HTTP-CoAP proxy.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2012 07:27:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:31:35 UTC