W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > November 2012

[Bug 19923] html-polyglot should be a Note

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 13:50:20 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-19923-2486-0fux4mGBWI@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

--- Comment #3 from Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> ---
(In reply to comment #2)

> I object to Polyglot Markup being framed as an Extension Specification.

Can it be anything *but* an extension spec? Is there anything else that allows
it to be published - at all? If it is not an extension spec, then what is it?

> If
> conformance of either the text/html or the application/xhtml+xml is not
> fully defined, such a lack of detail should be fixed in the upstream WHATWG
> spec.

One example of such a (possible) detail is that (at least per Validator.nu),
then, for XHTML5, there is no requirement to use <tbody> inside a table. Do you
suggest to fix that in the HTML5 spec?

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 12 November 2012 13:50:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:31:35 UTC