- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 23:07:33 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16073 --- Comment #2 from Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu> 2012-03-03 23:07:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > That seems correct. I am not sure how spec linking works but that document (CSS 2010) is highly unhelpful and potentially confusing in various places where [CSS] is used (e.g. when the spec refers to 'unicode-bidi', 'whitespace', 'width', 'height', etc.). The preferred fallback when the corresponding CSS modules are so outdated should be CSS2.1, not this mysterious 2010 document, I think. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 3 March 2012 23:07:35 UTC