[Bug 16611] Are reverse domain names sufficient for capability detection ?

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16611

Martin Soukup <martin.soukup@irdeto.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |martin.soukup@irdeto.com

--- Comment #1 from Martin Soukup <martin.soukup@irdeto.com> 2012-06-12 13:28:55 UTC ---
In order to support interoperability I believe that this needs to be specified
within a given Key System at least. It may be sufficient to require that any
supported Key System must define a common mechanism for identifying
capabilities across implementations. I believe we are unlikely to succeed in
specifying capabilities in a useful but cross-Key System way but defining the
framework has value in my opinion. Specifically defining how versions and
capabilities can be queried and what the behaviour is when querying in a
version-less manner, if this is supported.

I assume from the current issue description that this would cover concepts such
as domain support and embedded licenses? Would it allow things like querying
whether the UA is a member of a given domain?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2012 13:28:58 UTC