W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > February 2012

[Bug 15630] update ORIGIN reference

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:49:52 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1RvPhQ-00075Y-Qm@jessica.w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15630

--- Comment #5 from Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> 2012-02-09 08:49:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
> satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
> you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
> reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
> Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
> title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
> yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
>    http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html
> 
> Status: Accepted
> Change Description: no spec change
> Rationale: If the request here is just a very overly convoluted way of saying
> "please refer to Adam's RFC rather than his earlier draft", then this seems to
> have been fixed already.

a) The bug was "[ORIGIN] has been published as RFC 6454". What's not clear
about that?

b) Again, your resolution "worksforme" pretends that there was nothing to do,
when indeed you did make the change. So the correct resolution is "fixed".

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 9 February 2012 08:50:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 9 February 2012 08:50:12 GMT