W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > February 2012

[Bug 15630] update ORIGIN reference

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:02:47 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Ruvvr-0006ee-L9@jessica.w3.org>

Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
         AssignedTo|rubys@intertwingly.net      |ian@hixie.ch

--- Comment #3 from Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> 2012-02-08 01:02:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The original bug isn't addressed by the given decision.

The relevant portion of the decision:

Note that the change requested is to keep the spec updated with respect 
to the statuses of the relevant documents per RFC 2026.  In the time 
since that Change Proposal has been written, one such status has 
changed, and a bug report was opened to reflect that change:


The editor is strongly encouraged to process that bug and any others 
like it concurrently with the execution of this decision.

> Reassigning to chairs for clarification.

Reassigning back with the above clarification.

Just so it is clear: the decision is to follow RFC 2026.  The original Change
Proposal reflected the state of the relevant specs at the time it was written. 
At least one spec changed state, and a separate bug report was opened on that
change, and that bug was referenced in the decision.  You are encouraged to
process the Change Request and this bug concurrently.

If for any reason you do not know how to create a proper citation for the
origin spec given its current state and RFC 2026, please mark this as RESOLVED
NEEDSINFO, and I am confident that Julian will provide the necessary spec text
for you to apply.

Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2012 01:04:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:31:26 UTC