W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > December 2012

[Bug 19925] Drop XHTML from the title of the document

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 05:52:23 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-19925-2486-kEdh9XlsBX@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19925

--- Comment #15 from Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> (In reply to comment #13)

> <h1>Polyglot Markup: HTML-Compatible XHTML Documents</h1>
> <h2>A conservative and serialization agnostic profile of HTML5.</h2>

While not yet convinced about removing "XHTML", I very much support Sam’s idea
of adjusting the scope of the spec.

However, we should look wider than the robustness principle/Postel’s law
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robustness_principle

Other relevant principles could be

* Redundancy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redundancy_(engineering)
* Fault tolerance http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fault_tolerance

For instance, redundancy considerations could be a reason to recommend to have
more than one failure point when it comes to setting the encoding.

Another example is the DOCTYPE: It is of no use in XHTML, but the risk that
XHML is consumed as text/html is so high that it is a good idea to include it
even in pure XHTML documents.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2012 05:52:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 December 2012 05:52:27 GMT