https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13306 --- Comment #5 from Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> 2012-04-10 16:04:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Created attachment 1113 [details] > Patch that adds a deadline for WG decisions -1 If a proposal does not have enough details to be implemented without investigation, I would expect such an objection to occur no later than the CfC or survey that relates to this proposal. Editors need to be able to devote enough time to W3C activities to process decisions within the 1 month allotted. Should is not strong enough. Notifications are required. Extensions should be asked for well before the dates are missed. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.Received on Tuesday, 10 April 2012 16:04:59 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 10 April 2012 16:04:59 GMT