- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 01:39:04 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13943 --- Comment #12 from Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> 2011-09-28 01:39:02 UTC --- > > I don't really understand what authoring mistake is going to end up with that > > being necessary. Why do you think multiple IDs is a likely error? Surely most > > authors wouldn't provide any IDs at all. > > I don't think it's a likely error, I just think the parser should be robust and > not throw away cues when it would be just as easy to recover. > > (I would also like some consistency on this point, fixing just this while > leaving other aspects of the parser very strict would admittedly be arbitrary.) How many lines do you want to parse before expecting a line with "-->" in it? This has the potential danger that if somebody really screwed up their WEBVTT file and it's a very long file that we end up parsing the whole file before we notice that there aren't any cues. Is that desirable? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2011 01:39:05 UTC