- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 22:26:04 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13359 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|ian@hixie.ch |contributor@whatwg.org --- Comment #18 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2011-09-26 22:26:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) > CableTVCorp (O) creates an electronic program guide with a page depicted as a > grid of videos V1...V4 provided by 3rd party content providers P1...P4. > > V1...V4, in turn, contain or refer to timed track metadata content (e.g., video > descriptions, etc), which UA (upon decoding V1...V4) expose to O's JS client > code via TextTrackCue.getCueAsSource(). > > O does not (generally cannot) a priori > know the timed track metadata content type Yes it can. P1...P4 would just tell O what they are. I don't understand the problem here. This is a well-established pattern on the Web. An aggregator site gets information from third parties and those parties tell the aggregator exactly what they are providing, so that the aggregator can make use of it. Sometimes the aggregator explicitly specifies the format (e.g. Google Maps' transit directions feature has a specified format that transit companies can use), sometimes it's the other way around (e.g. Yahoo! Finance pulls information in from a number of different sources each of which might use its own format). Either way, though, the aggregator knows what the format of the data is. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 26 September 2011 22:26:05 UTC