- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 23:23:36 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13410 --- Comment #8 from David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> 2011-09-23 23:23:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > I agree that it needs to be defined, but how to serialise XML interoperably > seems like an issue for the XML spec, not the HTML spec. Not really. The XML spec doesn't define any object model that the xml syntax parses to, so there is nothing for it to define the serialisation of. The place in the "XML family of specs" where an object model for which serialisation could be defined was/is the DOM specs, but as you know, most of the parts of that relevant to the web browser context are either incorporated into the html spec or being refreshed as part of the same suite. In this case since one of that family of specs is explicitly about serialising the DOM, that seems like the natural place for it. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 23 September 2011 23:23:37 UTC