- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 07:41:33 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13995 --- Comment #17 from Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> 2011-09-21 07:41:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #16) > Didn't we change <video> to strictly adhere to HTTP here? AFAIK, nothing has changed since http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11984 was filed. AFAICT, the spec still says to check if Content-Type is one of the supported types, missing or application/octet-stream and to then sniff. However, the spec is (deliberately?) vague here, so I can't say for sure. In any case we all know that the spec is bogus until Bug 11984 is resolved in a way that everyone is actually willing to implement. > What's the signature for TTML? It's XML, we all know that sniffing it is not a good idea. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 21 September 2011 07:41:36 UTC