- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:43:19 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10830 --- Comment #49 from Murata <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp> 2011-09-20 16:43:19 UTC --- I sent the following e-mail to public-html@w3.org >> Bug 10830 was not intended to be WONTFIX, I was sincere in my request for >> feedback in comment 27. It has since been escalated to issue 172. >> >> May I suggest that issue 172 be closed pending the actual resolution of >> the bug according to the working group process. I would be happy to >> escalate the bug myself should the bug in fact result in a WONTFIX >> resolution. > >But the project editor claimed: > >> Note that despite repeated claims to the contrary, none of the browsers >> actually support <rb> any differently than any other random element like <foo>. > >I think that the HTML WG is the best place to discuss about this >factual issue, since >it has implementers of major browsers. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 20 September 2011 16:43:21 UTC