- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 08:29:22 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13995 --- Comment #11 from Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> 2011-09-16 08:29:18 UTC --- I can't find any MUST requirements at all in http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616#section-14.17 or related sections, how would this be a violation? As with <video>, I see 3 options here: 1. Always obey Content-Type 2. Always ignore Content-Type 3. Add sniffing for WebVTT to http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-websec-mime-sniff-03 and use the sniffed type, not the official content type. If spec'd as I imagine it, this would allow serving WebVTT as text/plain, but serving it as application/ttml+xml would fail. (1) is unacceptable, (2) is what we've implemented, but (3) could be tolerable if <video> were also made consistent with that. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 16 September 2011 08:29:26 UTC