W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > September 2011

[Bug 13943] The "bad cue" handling is stricter than it should be

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 04:27:45 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1R2FAP-0003u7-O2@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13943

--- Comment #4 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2011-09-10 04:27:44 UTC ---
It makes all kinds of extensions possible, for example it allows configuration
default blocks, etc, all by just having the syntax not include a valid time
range in the second line of the block. Your proposal (which if I understand
correctly is to just keep trying to read a time line until it's successful?)
would preclude that. So far, all the extensions proposed have been of this
nature, rather than of the nature of adding features to a cue  which we can
already do anyway, by adding more settings after the time range (which is why
invalid settings are ignored, and don't cause the cue to be dropped).

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 10 September 2011 04:27:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:31:18 UTC