W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > September 2011

[Bug 13943] The "bad cue" handling is stricter than it should be

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 04:27:45 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1R2FAP-0003u7-O2@jessica.w3.org>

--- Comment #4 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2011-09-10 04:27:44 UTC ---
It makes all kinds of extensions possible, for example it allows configuration
default blocks, etc, all by just having the syntax not include a valid time
range in the second line of the block. Your proposal (which if I understand
correctly is to just keep trying to read a time line until it's successful?)
would preclude that. So far, all the extensions proposed have been of this
nature, rather than of the nature of adding features to a cue  which we can
already do anyway, by adding more settings after the time range (which is why
invalid settings are ignored, and don't cause the cue to be dropped).

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 10 September 2011 04:27:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:31:18 UTC