- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 16:27:33 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14087 --- Comment #3 from Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net> 2011-09-08 16:27:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > in the referenced email you state > > > > I don't believe there was even a bug report filed on this one, it was just > > removed[3][4]. > > > > > > In fact I believe that this action was at least partly as a result of (and > > certainly part of the successful resolution of) bug 11204 > > Thank you for identifying this bug. > > Since that bug wasn't specific to removing innerHTML et al from the HTML5 > specification to a document hosted elsewhere, I don't believe this move was a > result of a bug request. But at least we have something resembling a historical > context for the move. Boris had extremely good points in that bug. This bug is focused on the move, but I do believe once the move is reverted, we also need to address the fact that the HTML WG is making changes to elements controlled by other working groups. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 8 September 2011 16:27:39 UTC