- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 20:15:11 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13423 Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | --- Comment #45 from Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net> 2011-09-07 20:15:08 UTC --- This really isn't a Google Legal decision. Until such time as the Editing API is under W3C control, this text should be maintained in the HTML5 document. As a member organization Google agreed to abide by the W3C's policies, including the patent policy. It's as simple as that. If the co-chairs agree with you that you can close this item, then I'll that this item be made into a TrackerRequest. However, since the decision was made to remove the material and pull it outside of the W3C, I believe this also fits the right circumstances for a Formal Objection, too. Since this is a fairly serious item--one member organization taking material from the W3C, even against the express wishes of another organization (Apple)--I think perhaps a Formal Objection may be the better option. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 7 September 2011 20:15:13 UTC