- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:29:24 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13435
John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|WORKSFORME |
--- Comment #7 from John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu> 2011-09-06 19:29:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
>
> Status: Accepted
> Change Description: no spec change
> Rationale:
>
> When the video is paused, the current captions do keep showing. What makes you
> think otherwise?
What makes you assume that this will be the default behavior? This is not yet
specified, and I wonder aloud why being more specific in a specification is a
bad thing?
Is there a technical reason for not adding the additional sentence: "If
synchronized text (e.g., captions or subtitles) or sign-language
tracks are present, those tracks must be represented in the paused frame as
well."?
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2011 19:29:30 UTC