- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:50:35 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14029 --- Comment #16 from Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com> 2011-09-06 10:50:34 UTC --- I too would also like to see this resolved by an official policy statement from (at least) the HTMLWG chairs, if not the W3C themselves. Why? Because I find it offensive that the W3C would allow a normative reference (and requirements!) in a standard to a document that has been authored by a pseudonymous author (and is freely available) _BUT_ will not accept normative references to documents developed by internationally recognized standards bodies, that just happen to be behind "pay walls". -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2011 10:50:40 UTC