- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 02:13:09 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14419 Frank Olivier <franko@microsoft.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |franko@microsoft.com --- Comment #4 from Frank Olivier <franko@microsoft.com> 2011-10-11 02:13:08 UTC --- Splitting the OR and addressing the two statements: "when canvas isn't supported - the canvas element's content should be displayed, so excluding input types like text and select is discriminatory" If the UA doesn't support canvas, the 'fallback' content is displayed. At the moment there is nothing in the spec that prohibits authors from adding input type=text in this scenario; but I would imagine that they would create the same solution for non-canvas UAs and a11y fallback content scenarios. "For blind users - the canvas element's content should be displayed, so excluding input types like text and select is discriminatory" As Tab points out, recreating text editing in canvas is not possible; the author would not be able to recreate all the features on the UA's platform that aid text entry/editing. Limiting input type=text in this scenario makes sense, as we don't want authors created halfbaked solutions where better alternatives are clearly available. FWIW I have not seen any projects where authors are recreating text input/editing with canvas. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2011 02:13:11 UTC