- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 02:12:20 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14363 --- Comment #3 from John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu> 2011-10-04 02:12:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > > Certainly within that community you should be able to use it, sure. That's > always been the way Web standards work. If you have a community who want to do > something, you just write a spec and agree to it and then within that > community, that's how the technology works. The HTML spec actually calls that > out explicitly; see the last few paragraphs of the "Extensibility" section. Please define "wide peer review". At issue is the accuracy and validity of the assertion of Ratified. This should be measurable and verifiable by any concerned 3rd party, and the specification should specify how this is done. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2011 02:12:22 UTC