W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > November 2011

[Bug 13240] Consider replacing <time> with <data>

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 08:24:22 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1RMy1e-0004sQ-DR@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13240

--- Comment #74 from Peter Winnberg <peter.winnberg@gmail.com> 2011-11-06 08:24:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #73)
> Can that be split into smaller issues?

Yes, I guess most of the discussion has been about the data element and the
time element so maybe:

"Should HTML5 have a time element"
"Should HTML5 have a data element"

This does not really cover the pubdate attribute or the atom conversion
section. But on the other hand I don't really object to removing them.

> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Mar/0586.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jan/att-0218/issue-76-decision.html

My issue with the schema.org examples could be handled as a counter-proposal if
someone tries to re-introduce them in the spec ( after the revert ).

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 6 November 2011 08:26:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 November 2011 08:26:34 GMT