- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 09:11:21 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12777 --- Comment #5 from Chris <jaboc2kl@googlemail.com> 2011-05-26 09:11:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > > (In reply to comment #3) > > The problem with the keywords meta is that it's all but useless and is actively > > ignored my most major search engines. This means that it is now effectively a > > dead part of the HTML spec and what's the point of that? > > What makes you think that the same wouldn't happen with "context"? I had considered this and it was part of my original idea to limit the number of recognised words / phrases to a maximum of 5. That's more than enough to position the document contextually and it'll prevent the abuse that keywords suffered from. e.g. You could have a page described as "Science, Research, Whitepaper, Astro-physics;" OR "Technology, Web Design, HTML 5, Specification, Suggestion;" Sorry for not stating that in my original comment. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 26 May 2011 09:11:26 UTC