- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 18:13:47 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12631 --- Comment #6 from Peter Winnberg <peter.winnberg@gmail.com> 2011-05-09 18:13:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > No, I said that "In nearly all older browsers, the only difference between <h1> > and <h2> is the CSS that applies to them". Opera does pay attention to them in > a limited fashion if you turn on a setting. Other browsers don't at all, > though some extensions that third parties have written do. > > The WCAG guidelines were written before explicit sectioning was added to HTML, > and thus cannot be looked to for advice on how to deal with explicit > sectioning. In any case, the WCAG Techniques document is not a browser > implementation, it's a set of advice. And of course, you're absolutely correct, the WCAG is not a browser implementation. But I thought that would be enough for you to understand that this is important in the context of assistive technology ( which is *implemented* ). In addition to the support in mainstream user agents. If needed I could try to track down specific implementations, but that should not really be needed because all I wanted added was a small note that using only h1 + section does have disadvantages. I am not asking for any major changes. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 9 May 2011 18:13:49 UTC