- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 21:38:52 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12096 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |ian@hixie.ch Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2011-05-04 21:38:52 UTC --- EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: Firefox, Opera, and WebKit use the last one when they're all the same. They use the last one with the earliest time if there's several conflicting times. They use different ones if the elements are inserted at different times. Try changing the timing on this one (900, 1100, 2000): http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/saved/976 IE always goes with the first one, exactly per spec. This is a far simpler solution, and since it's IE doing it, likely not a compat problem. So I think on the whole it would be better to converge on what the spec says now. If you disagree, please actually describe in detail what the conformance criteria should be, because I can't work out how to phrase the more complicated behaviour such that it handles all the various edge cases. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 4 May 2011 21:38:55 UTC