- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 23:21:31 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11828 --- Comment #18 from Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net> 2011-05-03 23:21:30 UTC --- Sorry, consistently "applied" procedure in place. As for the books--if the specification changes because of processes and procedures in place, then yeah, authors take that gamble. Note, though, that this hurts all the readers, too, so don't discount the negative impact of significant spec changes at this time in the process. Still, a logically arrived at and consistently applied change has to be accepted by everyone. But if the change is applied inconsistently, capriciously--more, in my opinion, to disrupt than form a consensus--than no, authors shouldn't have to pay the cost. Authors shouldn't have to pay the cost for immaturity. No one should. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2011 23:21:33 UTC