- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:28:19 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12279
Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
CC| |xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-i
| |ua.no
Resolution|FIXED |
--- Comment #3 from Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> 2011-03-14 20:28:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Some, I think, purely editorial things:
> ]]
> 6.5.1 HTTP Headers and http-equiv Declarations
>
> The following HTTP headers and http-equiv declarations warrant special
> discussion in polyglot markup.
Shouldn't this example belong under 6.5.1.1 ?
> Example
> http-equiv: <meta http-equiv="Content-Language" content="ru"/>
> HTTP header: Content-language: ru
>
> 6.5.1.1 Content-Language
>
> There are no direct issues with regard to the use of Content-Language as long
> as the language attribute is declared on the root element, as described in
> Language Attributes. By declaring the language attribute on the root element,
> polyglot markup avoids the differences between XML and HTML in regard to
> Content-Language.
> Do you want to explain the
> differences between HTML and XML in regard to Content-Language?
>
> ]]
> By declaring the language attribute on the root element, polyglot markup avoids
> the differences between XML and HTML in regard to Content-Language.
> [[
Not really explain more. But I would suggest this final touch, from the word
"avoids" and onwards:
]] _overcomes_a_difference_ between XML and HTML in regard to Content-Language
[[
(there is just one differnce, in principle, so no need to need plural.) Cheers!
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 14 March 2011 20:28:21 UTC