[Bug 11486] Remove rel=archives in favor of rel=index. They are extremely similar and not that useful to have separately.

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11486

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |

--- Comment #7 from Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> 2011-03-10 18:29:09 UTC ---
I'm unhappy with the way this change was applied (in the context of resolving
an unrelated WG decision, 128), and thus would appreciate if we confirm that
this change actually increases WG consensus.

Thoughts:

- Anne raised this then later changed his mind (see comment 3).

- Both Edward and I recommended to keep it.

- Mike Smith registered the link relation with IANA in good faith; removing it
from the spec at this stage requires a change to the registry.

- I don't believe any good reason was given for the removal that wouldn't also
apply to many other link relations in the spec (such as "external", just to
name one).

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Thursday, 10 March 2011 18:29:13 UTC