W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > March 2011

[Bug 12254] Investigate if <progress> element wouldn't need to be form-associated element

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2011 12:21:43 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1PwCxz-0005yG-EE@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12254

--- Comment #2 from Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@gmail.com> 2011-03-06 12:21:42 UTC ---
Another possibility, in which case having progress/meter form-associated makes
more sense, would be to make them resettable. That would make them work
closer to output.
In a way progress/meter are different kinds of representations of some
abstract output.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 6 March 2011 12:21:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 March 2011 12:21:45 GMT