- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 03:02:37 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10723 --- Comment #15 from Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> 2011-03-04 03:02:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) > What is the use case? Do you have examples of sites today that use this with > Flash? (I'm aware of examples of sites that support the start-time feature.) 1. For example this site: http://eopas.rnld.unimelb.edu.au/transcripts/48#t=23.0,28.62 (you will have to accept the cookie to get in and then reload that url) This site publishes ethnographic audio & video recordings and allows jumping directly into segments of the content by start/end time. This is not only used for playback and research, but also for quoting when publishing research. 2. Also this site: http://metavid.org/w/index.php?title=Stream:senate_proceeding_02-04-11/0:00:25/0:01:45&tl=1 This site publishes long videos (recordings of senate sittings) and allows direct access and embedding of snippets. While the URL scheme does not conform to the spec of the W3C Media Fragments WG, the idea is the same: have a start and end time in the URL. 3. Then of course there's the whole use case collection in the requirements doc, e.g. - search result: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-reqs/#scenario1.1 - pagination: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-reqs/#scenario2.1 - play bookmark fragments: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-reqs/#scenario2.2 - fragment mashup: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-reqs/#scenario3.3 -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 4 March 2011 03:02:39 UTC