W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > March 2011

[Bug 12021] Is <time>2011</time> acceptable? The formulation "precisedate" suggests that it is not, but an example says that "the year is not marked up at all, since marking it up would not be particularly useful", implying (IMHO) that it would be _possible_ to use <

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 02:10:58 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1PvKTq-0004Ot-Ey@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12021

--- Comment #3 from contributor@whatwg.org 2011-03-04 02:10:58 UTC ---
Checked in as WHATWG revision r5941.
Check-in comment: clarify <time> example
http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=5940&to=5941

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 4 March 2011 02:11:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 4 March 2011 02:11:00 GMT