W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > March 2011

[Bug 12021] Is <time>2011</time> acceptable? The formulation "precisedate" suggests that it is not, but an example says that "the year is not marked up at all, since marking it up would not be particularly useful", implying (IMHO) that it would be _possible_ to use <

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 01:58:00 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1PvKHI-0003ht-PP@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12021

Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |ian@hixie.ch
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #2 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2011-03-04 01:58:00 UTC ---
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Accepted
Change Description: see diff given below
Rationale: Concurred with reporter's comments and thus clarified example.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 4 March 2011 01:58:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 4 March 2011 01:58:02 GMT