[Bug 12918] I found that you limited the keywords acceptable for the meta-name attribute and for the link-rel attribute. In the specs you use exhaustive lists of allowed keywords. In my opinion you should only suggest keywords. See also http://webhel.blogspot.com/20

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12918

Hans <h.n.vandergraaf@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |CLOSED

--- Comment #8 from Hans <h.n.vandergraaf@gmail.com> 2011-06-25 18:23:16 UTC ---
I have give you my opinion and learned that it is possible to place a request
for a new keyword at the Wiki http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/MetaExtensions

So if anyone thinks it is necessary to register an old keyword (like language)
for backward compatability with older browsers or specific browser designed for
blind then it should be possible

I still don't completely understand **why** this "content" should be part of
the standard. Isn't it usual that everything between two quotes is content and
not part of the standard, like: title="This text is not part of the standard!"

I also think that the message given by the validator should have a reference to
the wiki mentioned above.

In the end I don't have a problem with this approach of handling with keywords
allthough I wonder why none of the keywords at the wiki is "Ratified"

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Saturday, 25 June 2011 18:23:18 UTC