- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:09:45 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13007 --- Comment #6 from Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> 2011-06-21 15:09:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Offtopic: It might be worth asking on the schema.org mailing list if itemid > actually means anything when used with their vocabulary. The issue has more to do with expected behavior than schema.org. I just used them as an example. When you use the same @itemid on the page, is the expected behavior that: 1) All properties for the same @itemid are merged with two separate items on the page. 2) All properties and types for the same @itemid are merged. 3) What happens when somebody does a getItems() and uses one of the itemtypes - are all properties returned? I'll delve down deeper into the spec later on tonight, but this was surprising to me. With RDFa and RDF in general, all things w/ the same "@itemid" would be merged into a single object with multiple types when retrieved via the RDFa API. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2011 15:09:51 UTC