- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 06:19:18 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11197 --- Comment #2 from Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> 2011-06-20 06:19:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > I propose that, instead of requiring a Change Proposal, we ask that a change to > reintroduce a reverted change, or to make a likely-controversial closely > related change, should be either: > > - Based on a Working Group Decision (these can clearly override a revert) > - Based on proposing a diff to the WG for discussion first > > The second is what we have apparently done in this case in the past with some > success, so it does not seem like an unreasonable request. Made this change, also adding a bug report when before the relevant cutoff as discussed amongst the Chairs, here: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy-v2.html.diff?r1=1.30&r2=1.31&f=h -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 20 June 2011 06:19:19 UTC