- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:20:01 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12417
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |ian@hixie.ch
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #6 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2011-06-15 23:20:00 UTC ---
Using class="notranslate" isn't an abuse as far as I can tell.
This seems like a feature that would get only narrow use. Is it really worth
adding to the language?
It seems like the ideal solution would be a new language subtag, frankly.
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html
Status: Rejected
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale: there's already a solution, a better solution might be to use a new
language subtag, and it's not clear a solution is actually needed.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 15 June 2011 23:20:02 UTC