[Bug 12776] Define process for deciding whether a draft is REC-track or Note-track

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12776

--- Comment #11 from Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> 2011-06-01 13:31:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8 from Sam)
> > Until or unless the following bugs are resolved, we still need a process for
> > deciding whether a given document is REC-track or Note-track:
> > 
> > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12725
> > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12726
> 
> There isn't actually any such thing as "Note-track". So the premise on which
> both those bugs and this bug were raised is flawed.

I encourage you to work with Lachlan Hunt and get him to withdraw his Formal
Objections on this matter and agree to close these bugs.  Failing that, I think
it is our best interest to document the rationale for the approach we are
taking and provide input to the Director as to what course the Working Group as
a whole prefers taking.

In short, I continue to support Maciej's proposed resolution.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2011 13:31:50 UTC