- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 10:13:01 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12839 Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hsivonen@iki.fi --- Comment #2 from Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> 2011-06-01 10:12:59 UTC --- I request resolving this by comparing identifiers code-point-for-code-point without normalization before comparison. (In reply to comment #0) > private tests of today's user agents (IE8, Firefox4, Opera11, Safari, Chrome) > shows that > > that <a href="#å">link</a> targets <p id="å"> > whereas <a href="#å">link</a> targets <p id="å"> Are you sure you meant exactly what you wrote? You next paragraph suggests that you didn't? > Thus, today's user agents do actually treat them as unique identifiers, despite > that they both refer to the same "å" (å). > > However, in order toi avoid author confusion as well as user confusion, this > should not be considered valid. Until very recently, Validator.nu treated failure to be in NFC as an error. Now it treats it as a warning, because there was no normative trail from HTML5 to charmod-norm C300. Note to Hixie: If you contemplate adding a normative trail to charmod-norm C300, I suggest pinging the W3C i18n group first, since they might not like what charmod-norm says anymore. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2011 10:13:03 UTC